Warwickshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Warwickshire, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Warwickshire. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.WarwickshireWikipedia:WikiProject WarwickshireTemplate:WikiProject WarwickshireWikiProject Warwickshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This is something that I have scratched my head over 1,000 times before. Some people seem to like putting things in double square brackets (to link them to other wikipedia pages) even though there are no pages. Now to me this seems a little pointless and just makes articles look messy. Have I missed something here? If no-one replies within a week I will remove the needless link. But they will of course stay if someone replies! Cls14 00:34, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Which link do you think should be deleted? Seems to me that all of them will turn blue one day ;). besides I don't think it makes anything look messy just shows you what needs to be done, so instead of removing dead links we should rather be filling them... --ro|3ek 08:43, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted some of the frankly unnecessary dead links. Left the ones that may be created open. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ali Basheer (talk • contribs) 19:21, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warwickshire Village of the Year

I attempted to find some material to support this claim, but ran upon nothing significant. I have failed to find any websites that 1) Represent the competition, or 2) List the winners of it. Whilst numerous parish websites proudly list their winning, the Salford Priors website does not.

I found an article on the parish website listing a 1st place in the 'Warwickshire Best Kept Village Competition' (http://www.salfordpriors.gov.uk/pdfs/annualreport0708.pdf), if that is the intended competition result the editor wished to add.
I also found reference (In parish minutes) of no formal entry being made in 2008 (http://www.salfordpriors.gov.uk/pdfs/minutes/minutes080319.pdf).
In addition, I found reference to the Salford Priors parish having 'experience' pertaining to the (now defunct) Calor Village of the Year awards (q. "... As Salford Priors had been in this position last year ...", http://www.bidfordonavon-pc.gov.uk/pdfs/minutes/annual070305.pdf).
Another reference found was that Salford Priors won a runner-up position of 'Special award for the overall winner of the Business category' in 2005 (http://www.ajcopp.plus.com/VillageOfTheYear2005.html).
In support of the claim, I found HenleyNews.co.uk as listing Salford Priors as being a previous recipient of the award (http://www.henleynews.co.uk/08_04_24.html).

I request removing the claim from the article, as no supporting citations have been (And by the looks of things, can be) provided. HJBristow (talk) 23:49, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Salford Priors. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070825172845/http://www.salford-hall.co.uk/rooms.htm to http://salford-hall.co.uk/rooms.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:12, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WarAG

WarAG is not linked to another Wikipedia page and maybe it needn't be, but I wondered what ministry in the wartime government the abbreviation stood for. Perhaps someone could add an explanation in parenthesis after the word. BTW, Land Army does have a link, but the link is not shown.--Oldontarian (talk) 09:04, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]