Talk:Saint-Louis-du-Louvre/GA2
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 19:48, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
I'll take another look at it tomorrow! Zwerg Nase (talk) 19:48, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
To get back to the issues raised in the first review:
- Google books: this template should help. But I didn't really mean that, I meant the pages around here, where I often need to follow another link to get to what you point to (such as with Paul-Henri Marron in ref #10).
- I still have a small problem with ref #11: The source says that the building was demolished in 1811 but that parts remained until 1850, being replaced with the Denon Wing. By clicking through some pages, I found that that is actually is a part of the Louvre Palace. Maybe you can clarify that in the prose, so that it matches better to the source?
- You wikilinked Louvre Palace in the lead, but you should link it at the first mention in the content body as well.
- The first paragraph of Saint-Louis-du-Louvre should not be without an inline citation.
Again, seven days to take care of the issues. Zwerg Nase (talk) 11:53, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- I've made appropriate edits. Thanks for the tip on the Google Books template. I haven't found a way to deal with the issue of the l'Oratoire du Louve pages. I still want to use that reference because it provides some unique information. I have added one non-web reference taken from the French Wikipedia page for Marron that is the source of some of that sentence.Djkeddie (talk) 23:50, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- It's a pass now, congratulations :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:22, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- I will however list it under Art and architecture, not World History. Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:27, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- Many thanks, having another person look at an article is invaluable.Djkeddie (talk) 22:25, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- I will however list it under Art and architecture, not World History. Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:27, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- It's a pass now, congratulations :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:22, 13 August 2015 (UTC)