Talk:Saiga semi-automatic rifle/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 17:27, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article isn't too bad so far, but it's a way from good article status. The biggest concerns is the lack of citing, with many sections being unsourced. Anything controversial should be cited, and at least one cite per paragraph. There are some sentences that are rather confusing as well. Namely, "The rifle is different in that many aspects as well." where I think 'that' is an unnecessary word to add in, doesn't make sense as is. Also, the sporter rifle definition feels a little clustered without wikilinks, cites, etc. in the first long paragraph. As a result I'm failing the article as is. When the issues are fixed, it can be renominated at GAN. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 17:27, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]