Talk:Sahasam Swasaga Sagipo

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedy deleted as being recently created, having no relevant page history and duplicating an existing English Wikipedia topic, because... (your reason here) --Satya durga reddy (talk) 09:09, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is A Dubbing movie in Telugu of Tamil Film Achcham Enbadu Marimayada

@MichaelQSchmidt: Dear administrator, I don't know to what extent are you aware of the upcoming film Achcham Enbadhu Madamaiyada. Let me tell you that the director of the film had been simultaneously filming both the versions of the film. One is "Achcham Enbadhu Madamaiyada" and the other one is "Sahasam Swasaga Sagipo". The former is in Tamil language and the latter one is Telugu language. They are not dubbed except for the songs. Both are original language films with different star cast.

Further, the Tamil language film (Achcham Enbadhu Madamaiyada) has extensive coverage, reliable sources and details on the internet. All sources are appropriately cited. You may check my and other users' edits on the log of the page. The Telugu language has hardly any or nearly no such reliable sources talking about the film. I agree promotions, publicity and about the Telugu version have begun but that makes no point to Wikipedia. If you check the Telugu language page (Sahasam Swasaga Sagipo), the user Satya durga reddy has directly copied the words from the page of Achcham Yenbadu Madamaiyada.

If you still feel my claims aren't convincing, I'm ready to negotiate or have brief discussion with other experienced editors right here. Arjann (talk)

Not to get personal but the biting fact is that user Satya durga reddy is a new user over here and he needs to read what Wikipedia is not. He has also displayed Rhodium badge on his page which he isn't entitled to as of Spetember 19, 2015. Please see https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User:Satya_durga_reddy&action=info#mw-pageinfo-watchers.

An easily sourcable topic

No need to remove that which is not a blatant lie, is libelous, or fraud, when a questioning/requesting {{fact}} tag works just fine. Astopic notability is dependent on topic sources being available, even if not used, a little due diligence is always a good practice. For instance, diligence gives us

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

and WP:INDAFD: "Sahasam Swasaga Sagipo"

No need to forget courtesy nor ignore applicable guideline. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 05:54, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Avoid a block for disruptive editing

@Arjann: I have twice now requested that rather than remove sourcable information, you instead tag the stuff with which you have such personal issue. I have again returned that which you removed and placed the tags you felt disinclined to do, so please STOP removing sourcable content. And toward your argument, under WP:N, if sources exist, they do not ABSOLUTELY and POSITIVELY have to be used in order for a topic notability to be found. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 06:28, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification needed

@Kailash29792:, @Vensatry:, @Veera Dheera Sooran:, @SchroCat:, @Birdienest81:, @Dr. Blofeld: You all are invited here to discuss this matter about this film page. Arjann (talk) 06:34, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I request that sources be added to avoid merging this page with its Tamil version. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:40, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792:. Thank you so much. Go on MichaelQSchmidt's talk page to see my claims as well as see the view history log of Sahasam Swasaga Sagipo, what all I deleted for what particular reason. The admin isn't trying to understand my point. Arjann (talk) 06:44, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What is being sadly misunderstood here is WP:N, WP:WIP, WP:SEP, WP:IMPERFECT and that all really needed is aome personal diligence rather than an empty removal. A short ten minutes of effort under MOS:FILM is shown underway here. How is it that suggesting a little work to improve Wikipedia is seen as wrong by some??? Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 09:27, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Saahasam Swasaga Saagipo First Look Poster.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:07, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]