Talk:Sageworks
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sageworks article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This page was proposed for deletion by Bradv (talk · contribs) on 19 April 2010 with the comment: Non-notable company. Fails criteria set forth in WP:CORP. It was contested by Mdascola (talk · contribs) on 2010-04-30 with the comment: (Mdascola blocked as a sockpuppet, and COI likely) |
This page was proposed for deletion by DGG (talk · contribs) on 18 May 2014 with the comment: Insufficient evidence of notability -- fastest growing = "not yet notable" It was contested by Jackochs13 (talk · contribs) on 2014-05-28 with the comment: (Jackochs13 blocked as a sockpuppet, and COI likely) |
This page was proposed for deletion by Harald Forkbeard (talk · contribs) on 10 January 2015 with the comment: self-promotional article by a non-notable company It was contested by Cryptic (talk · contribs) on 2015-01-17 with the comment: Can't be prodded, as it's been done previously (twice). Strongly suggest AFD. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 18 January 2015 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. Edits made by the below user(s) were last checked for neutrality on 31-12-2016 by Example.
|
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
Start a discussion about improving the Sageworks page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Sageworks" page.
Categories:
- Stub-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Stub-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Stub-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Stub-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class North Carolina articles
- Low-importance North Carolina articles
- WikiProject North Carolina articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Talk pages of subject pages with paid contributions
- Paid contributions with no listed employer