Talk:Sagar Rajput

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hinduism Low‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cite on Sagar's Rajput /Kshatriya status

Too busy to get into at the moment, but check this ref: David Goodman Mandelbaum (1970). Society in India. University of California Press. pp. 454–. ISBN 9780520016231. Retrieved 25 May 2011. MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:44, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For California Total California will want to kill us Or hum yahan dharam ki sthapana karenge. Vijay chitara (talk) 23:29, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dhangar and sagar both are different community so don't mix it.

And you told that sagar are formerly shudra varna , if you have any documents than search sagar was a king of suryavanshi rajput and also ansestor of lord ram so please check and write authentic . Arjun kalena (talk) 04:16, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote that on the basis of the reference I found on the same page, I saw that the page was about Sagar Rajputs sanskritizing their status but it was edited that they actually kshatriyas, if they are kshatriyas, then they would have no reason to sanskritize to kshatriyahood. See what is written in that reference " Previously they were considered to be Dhangars—shepherds by occupation and Shudras by traditional varna."

I have no personal enmity with them just correcting errors by reading the source used for that point. 103.61.197.171 (talk) 11:53, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

आप बिना की साक्ष्य के सगर राजपूतों को शूद्र वर्ण का कैसे कह रहें हैं 2402:8100:3862:4FA3:2545:9C6:E7C6:8F7E (talk) 17:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no community called Shegar, Sagar in Rajout. So why have they been added in Rajput

They are dhangar and come under obc not general category Rajputs. There is no Sagar Rajputs ( Shegar etc) Rana of Bharat (talk) 09:10, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]