Talk:Safechuck v. MJJ Productions

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:

[[Child sexual abuse accusations against Michael Jackson#Further allegations by different accusers]] The anchor (#Further allegations by different accusers) has been deleted.

The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links.

Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error

Lawsuit

Hi all - i know this lawsuit is inflammatory to some but this is a hugely important legal ruling in the state of California as an employment law matter. Bhdshoes2 (talk) 16:02, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also this ruling is discussed on a zillion different pages about jackson - the page about his 05 acquittal, the page about the dance career of the plaintiffs, the page about the 2019 Leaving Neverland documentary, the page about the 1993 case. This particular ruling and cases needs its own page. Tagging my fellow Wikipedian [[user:××××] as I know he is an expert on Wikipedia guidelines Bhdshoes2 (talk) 16:09, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

removing the name of the guy I tagged because instead of actually attempting to engage in good faith, a User tried to get me sanctioned!