Talk:Safe and Secure Innovation for Frontier Artificial Intelligence Models Act

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Artificial Intelligence

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Artificial Intelligence, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Artificial intelligence on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Artificial IntelligenceWikipedia:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceTemplate:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence articles

Public reception?

Re: public reception, notable open-source, scientific, startup and investor opinions are missing in the current text.

For example, YC's open letter (https://static.politico.com/95/0a/a317efe44616af436ce6a4f32647/founder-led-statement-on-sb1047-june-20-2024-2.pdf), a16z's open letter and response website (https://a16z.com/podcast/californias-senate-bill-1047-what-you-need-to-know/, https://www.stopsb1047.com), Context Fund's impacts analysis (https://www.context.fund/policy/sb_1047_analysis.html) and Alliance for the Future's letter (https://www.affuture.org/post/9-context/).

Prominent scientists like Prof. Andrew Ng, Prof. Yann LeCun (Turing Award winner), Prof. Ion Stoica and Prof. Jeremy Howard have also expressed concern over SB-1047 in public comments and on the record in CA legislative sessions (eg. https://www.deeplearning.ai/the-batch/issue-257/, https://x.com/ylecun/status/1800222175099765029, https://x.com/AnjneyMidha/status/1811207378949607638, https://www.answer.ai/posts/2024-04-29-sb1047.html) Natsuko zadeslav (talk) 21:00, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Balance

Recent additions are welcome, but should support and opposition to the bill be given the same weight, with the aim of producing a balanced article? Astudent (talk) 04:32, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(came here from the NPOV noticeboard) The short answer is no, support and opposition don't have to be given the same weight. We should give them the same weight that reliable sources give them (per WP:BALANCE, Neutrality assigns weight to viewpoints in proportion to their prominence in reliable sources). Unfortunately, following the rules may lead in practice to a lack of balance in the article if one side is more vocal, but over time this becomes less of a problem as we can use better sources rather than just news articles.

I've noticed that some content in the article lacks sources or is based only on primary sources. I've tagged it, if it's not fixed within a reasonable time it can be removed. Alaexis_¿question? 08:23, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

agreed. also from npovn.

not sure about the ai policy institute, if its unbiased sourcing.

there is also a conspicuous lack of sourcing from local newspapers.

personally, i see this legislation is probably some form of Regulatory Capture. the lack of citations supporting that is a bit concerning and needs some work Bluethricecreamman (talk) 12:38, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Added secondary/tertiary sources on startup opposition. Natsuko zadeslav (talk) 18:13, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

exactly which perspectives are unbalanced? I don’t really see too much of a problem.

Main issue is still just copy editting and cleaning this article up more. I’ll give it a shot when I have a chance Bluethricecreamman (talk) 15:29, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Needs extensive reformatting

we need to reformat this article to follow WP:MOS

Some of the links/citations are to WP:TWITTER which in general cannot be used. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 14:14, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]