Talk:Sacred Military Constantinian Order of Saint George

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kingdom of Naples, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Kingdom of NaplesWikipedia:WikiProject Kingdom of NaplesTemplate:WikiProject Kingdom of NaplesKingdom of Naples

Catholicism Low‑importance

Sacred Military Constantinian Order of Saint George is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Orders, decorations, and medals

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of orders, decorations, and medals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Orders, decorations, and medalsWikipedia:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsTemplate:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsOrders, decorations, and medals
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Albania

	Sacred Military Constantinian Order of Saint George is part of the WikiProject Albania, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Albania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.AlbaniaWikipedia:WikiProject AlbaniaTemplate:WikiProject AlbaniaAlbania
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Comments

I recommend this stub as a candidate for speedy deletion. There are hundreds of these social clubs claiming descent from everyone since Adam (altho they might more properly claim descent from Lucy!) masquerading as genealogical societies or military orders: they have nothing to do with either. Doubtless they would all like their group listed in Wikipedia for their own glory.

If this group is worthy of note, then I recommend that it be added to its entry under http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Order_of_chivalry although I frankly believe that this page too is a mistake.

Orders of knighthood should be listed by country and by the monarch who created and maintains them. Certainly, Britain's Queen Elizabeth maintains an order of knighthood for those deemed worthy of inclusion. But membership is by order of the Queen, not by membership application and all such individuals are already public figures, such as Sir Sean Connery. http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Sean_Connery

I further recommend that a disambiguation article be written on pseudo-genealogical social clubs to distinguish them from real genealogical groups (such as the New England Genealogical Society), and to distinguish these pseudo-military orders from real military orders (such as the US Army Rangers). Wikipedia should expect that these pseudo-military orders will seek Wikipedia entries again and again. Seeking such a listing goes along with the feelings of inferiority that leads those who belong to these clubs to seek to prove their genealogy so as to gain admission to their little social club. ````

The above unsigned comment is rife with factual errors:

1) The Sacred Military Constantinian Order is not a "social club".

2) The US Army Rangers is not a "military order". It is a military unit.

3) The SMCO is not a genealogical ("pseudo" or otherwise) group. It does not require proof of geneaology for admission in the categories of grace or merit (or even in some instances in the category of justice.)

4) "Feelings of inferiority..." etc. is an ad hominem attack, and is not a proveable or quantifiable statement.

5) The author of the above comment does not appear to be entirely familiar with what an Order of Chivalry is. He/she mentions that Queen Elizabeth II maintains "an order" of knighthood. She "maintains" several different orders. His acceptance of her "order of knighthood" (sic) contradicts his belief that the article of the same name is a "mistake".

6) This Order of Chivalry was founded by a reigning monarch, and is maintained by his legitimate successor. The rights of deposed, non-abdicating monarchs to their heritable properties, including their chivalric orders, are protected by international law, beginning with the Congress of Vienna

71.85.151.177 (talk) 05:51, 19 January 2008 (UTC)Chevalier3[reply]

This article may need checking

Guy Stair Sainty has edited this article much and he has authored very pro-Infante Carlos articles outside of Wikipedia, so his contributions should be reviewed. - Gennarous (talk) 18:40, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What is "fictively established"? - not good English, for a start!

What about "according to legend, it was established"?203.184.41.226 (talk) 08:11, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Taking sides

The article seems to simply take the Don Carlos side in the dispute - it says that Prince Carlo's renunciation cannot have possibly applied to the Constantinian order. Presumably the other two claimants hold different interpretations on this. I assume Guy Stair Sainty was involved in putting the article in its current form. This is a bit problematic - Sainty obviously knows a lot about the subject, but he is also a partisan of the Calabrian side in the Two Sicilies succession dispute; he shouldn't be taken as a disinterested observer. It would be useful if we could do a better job on this. john k (talk) 18:25, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why still here?

Article was recommended for deletion in 2008 and has copyright issues and it is still here? Why? It is clearly not a real, recognized order that benefits only Bailey 2601:989:4200:88D:0:0:0:BD05 (talk) 07:32, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bailey is involved in a "rival" parallel organization based on the fact that there are two people who claim to head the House of Bourbon-Two Sicilies. It will take some work to make this clear. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 23:55, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://web.archive.org/web/20120305153513/http://www.constantinianorder.org/the-order/the-government-and-grades-of-the-order.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:15, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CoI edits

In these edits we have a new editor removing stuff that one major faction in the current dispute won't like. I have reverted it. Hunc (talk) 15:05, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]