Talk:Sacred Heart College (Adelaide)

Who wrote this? All men in the 'notable alumni'. Seriously. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.132.11.86 (talk) 11:19, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Football, football and more football

I attended SHC in the 80s. Interesting to see nothing has changed, ie its all about schoolboy footy

Nothing about Paringa Hall, the marist brothers, the boarding house etc. Ozbrettdj 01:36, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Sofixit.--cj | talk 13:26, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

I atteneded then too, great to see that they have acknowldged everything about football and nothing else, looks like there's been no notible female students in the last 25 years either. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.202.21.141 (talk) 01:24, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

What is your problem? The school has not created this page - Wikipedians have. So if you think more content should be included, then do so yourself! I wholeheartedly agree that if notable females have attended the school then they should be recognised - that's the point of Wikipedia, anyone can edit! Teachingwedge (talk) 03:31, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 10:33, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Shc sa au.jpg

The image Image:Shc sa au.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --22:36, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Football Issues

Currently in an unintended edit war with Pdfpdf over the notability of the following statement:

The college came to media attention in August 2013 when it was reported that Cory Gregson, a player within its first XVIII was not permitted to make his League debut with the Glenelg Football Club due to him being required to play in an inter-school game against Rostrevor College.

Considering this issue was reported in both print and broadcast media and is an ongoing issue in local football, it can be considered notable. In addition, it seems a bit strange to pull that statement out as being of questionable notability when it was one of the few statements that is referenced within this article and there are a number of questionable claims that have now been marked as citation needed. Screech1616 (talk) 14:30, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

a) Unintended or otherwise, your reversion of my challenge to your edit is contrary to WP policy. I'm pleased that you have responded by posting on the talk page and stopping any further edit warring.

b) What media attention? I'm guessing that the Guardian Messenger is the local-to-Sacred-Heart free weekly newspaper? If not, please inform me.

c) Sacred Heart is a venerable institution that's been around for a LONG time. You really need to devote some serious effort to convince me, and/or anyone else, that this is a "really important" topic that deserves appearing at the top of the article.

d) Please pay particular attention to the fact that I didn't delete your contribution.

e) However, please also pay attention to the fact that I simply moved it to the bottom of the article to a position more appropriate to the importance of the issue. Again, you really need to devote some serious effort to convince me, and/or anyone else, that this topic is more important than the history of the school, and/or any description of the school, and/or any description of the school's curriculum, and/or its activities, and/or its achievements

Pdfpdf (talk) 14:49, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

You justification of location of this information is valid, the bottom of the article is sufficient. I notice an anonymous user has deleted it now, i will reinstate.Screech1616 (talk) 06:07, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

References