Talk:Sacred–profane dichotomy

Anthropology Mid‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Religion

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion

Sociology

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology

Puritanism

I don't think the part about Puritanism makes sense, and seeing as there's not a lot of activity on this page, I don't think I'll wait for a reply. It seems to me that when a criticism of the dichotomy uses the phrase: "Such homely employments a carnal heart knows not how to submit unto..." it's not really criticizing the concept of the dichotomy, or even something terribly related to it. The word 'carnal' implying a belief in the sacred and profane binary. Carnal meaning the same as profane in this sense. What the Puritans are criticizing here is the hierarchical relation to God in the Catholic Church, not the concepts of sacred and profane as is being attempted in the Buddhist example in the paragraph before it. Franzose (talk) 09:32, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]