Talk:Sacral architecture

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 19, 2006	WikiProject peer review	Reviewed

Architecture Top‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion Top‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religious Buildings, Architecture and Monasticism (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious Buildings, Architecture and Monasticism, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Religious Buildings, Architecture and MonasticismWikipedia:WikiProject Religious Buildings, Architecture and MonasticismTemplate:WikiProject Religious Buildings, Architecture and MonasticismReligious Buildings, Architecture and Monasticism

Untitled

I think consideration need to be given to a merge of this page with Ecclesiastical architecture. Ecclesiastical is the correct term given architecture pertaining to religion. Giano | talk 21:03, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think it may be more appropriate to merge the ecclesiastical architecture stub with the much better developed article on church architecture. Glenn4pr 03:33, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Religion, Time-period or style?

I notice the headings are sometimes relating to the religion (Hindu, Islam), other times it is by time period(Medieval, Modern and post-modern), still other times it is by style (Gothic, Baroque). Is there a better way to organize this structure? Bytebear 18:07, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sacred architecture v's Religious architecture

It god-smacks and disbehoves me the suite of uniformed rationales that my peers provided for keeping the rubric "Religious architecture" instead of the inclusive auspice nominated... when the change of category was completed none of the aforementioned peers have re-qualified the opening paragraph which is still as per my edits. They clearly took a deep interest in improving the article: *coff coff* . Uniformed democracy is anathema! Altars, standing stones, sacred groves, mandala, medicine wheel and temenos are sacred architecture but they may not be religious architecture...
*shakes head*
B9 hummingbird hovering^{(talk • contribs)} 03:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Freemasonry and Sacred Archictecture

After reading Frank Albo's 2007 essay Masonic Parlante in a Canadian Temple of Democracy: The Manitoba Legislative Building as Initiatory Theatre, I'm surprised there isn't a section in this article on the link between Freemasonry and sacred architecture. --Loremaster (talk) 02:01, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sacred architecture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20041230180348/http://www.utulsa.edu:80/iss/mosque/MosqueFAQ.html to http://www.utulsa.edu/iss/Mosque/MosqueFAQ.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:47, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]