Talk:Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency (2023)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency (2023) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

U.S. Supreme Court cases

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment Mid‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

on quoting

Hi @Masem, in re this edit, can you let me know what it is about Kavanaugh's opinion and Kagan's opinion that allows them to be quoted, while the majority opinion is not allowed to be quoted? https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Sackett_v._Environmental_Protection_Agency_(2023)&diff=next&oldid=1165100841 Cranhandler (talk) 00:56, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've taking out Kagan's opinion which was uncited, but Kavanaugh's was at least sited to a Vox (third-party) article. I did find a similar source to cite the majority.

We dont want to be the ones pulling the "key quotes" from decisions because we are not supposed to be legal experts and deciding what is key is original research. we want third-party sources to highlight the key quotes we should use. Masem (t) 01:01, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense--I had only added the Alito quote to begin with because I thought it was questionable that there were 2 minority quotes without any quote for the majority. Appreciate your helpfulness! Cranhandler (talk) 01:03, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]