Talk:Sac and Fox Nation

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Oklahoma Mid‑importance

	Oklahoma portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposing split

Since Sac and Fox Nation is a specific tribe, perhaps there should be an articles for Sac and Fox peoples today. It might be a little redundant since articles about Sac (people) and Meskwaki people already exist. Eventually, hopefully, there would be articles for Sac and Fox Nation of Missouri in Kansas and Nebraska and Sac and Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa as well. -Uyvsdi (talk) 19:49, 11 April 2010 (UTC)Uyvsdi[reply]

Use of the word "Sac"

I have replaced the word "Sac" with "Sauk" when specifically referring to the Sauk people. It is not proper to refer to Sauk people as "Sac." Sac is the term settlers and government officials used when referring to the Sauk and Fox people and the term is acceptable only when referring to the Sauk and Meskwaki as a single tribe, Sac & Fox. —64.19.102.80 (talk)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sac and Fox Nation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:43, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Missing decades of history

The history here skips over Kansas in the 1850s and 1860s entirely without a mention, and goes straight to Iowa. There was a reservation in Kansas in Franklin County, that was displaced to Osage County in 1863 so that Greenwood Township, Franklin County, Kansas could be settled in its place starting that year and organized in 1865. This is in plenty of Kansas history books, starting with but by no means limited to Andreas 1883, p. 621, along with the Indian agent and his buildings, the stage company, and the moves into and out of Quenemo, Kansas.

Andreas, Alfred Theodore (1883). "Franklin County". History of the State of Kansas. Chicago: Alfred Theodore Andreas. OL 15439414M.

Uncle G (talk) 08:31, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]