Talk:STRIDE model

Computer Security: Computing Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tampering Link

The linked article isn't relevant to this.

Should we add this citation?

I'd like to add a link to http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sdl/archive/2009/08/27/the-threats-to-our-products.aspx which discusses the origin of STRIDE. However, that's my own blog post, to my employer's blog and such edits are (reasonably) frowned upon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emergentchaos (talk • contribs) 00:26, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

EmergentChaos, I would always go ahead and add the historical reference, including a Talk entry just before the commit to explain what you are doing, and why. I came here to discuss two things: 1) was the above, can we include a reference to the original creators, and 2) can we include a comparison to CIA (confidentiality, integrity, availability) or does anyone view that as not an appropriate comparison? DouglasHeld (80.229.146.237 (talk) 10:27, 8 January 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Would you mind adding it in? I've gotten fairly strong opinions on self-cite from Wikipedians. Also, I think a compare to CIA is entirely appropriate, as STRIDE is the absence of the properties we want, and those are CIA + AuthN, AuthZ and Non-repudiation Emergentchaos (talk) 17:12, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So as of Aug, 2018, the link in that post which points to the actual paper is broken. The link is titled "it's attached" and points to https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/cfs-file.ashx/__key/communityserver-components-postattachments/00-09-88-74-86/The-threats-to-our-products.docx. If you follow that link, you get a custom page that says "Oops! That page can’t be found." That's not a useful result. I have asked people at Microsoft to fix the link, and in the meantime have an archive copy of the actual paper at https://adam.shostack.org/microsoft/The-Threats-To-Our-Products.docx I think that's the best link to use to serve up the full paper. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emergentchaos (talk • contribs) 16:44, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, @DouglasHeld I added a table to address your question #2 of 8 January 2017 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emergentchaos (talk • contribs) 16:54, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]