Talk:SS Tubantia/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I'll be reviewing this article shortly. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:23, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Specific concerns

Won't affect GA status, but when was the order for building the ship made?
- I don't have access to that in English-language sources. — Bellhalla (talk) 17:21, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What does GRT stand for?
- Gross register tons; I had a bad parameter name in the {{GRT}} template which kept it from linking, but I've fixed that now. — Bellhalla (talk) 17:21, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neither of these two niggles will stand in the way of GA status. Congrats! Ealdgyth - Talk 13:59, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time to review the article! — Bellhalla (talk) 17:21, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]