Talk:SR Q1 class/GA2

GA Reassessment

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.

Where books or journals are being used as references, the relevant pages should also be given.

It's often easier to separate the References into Notes and Bibliography, to make it easier to provide references to different pages in the same book.

The infobox provides imperial to metric conversions, but the body of the article does not.

The Q1 locomotives in fiction section is too small to standalone. Suggest that this information is incorporated into the body of the article.

"... the locomotive was 14 tons lighter than its nearest rival in terms of weight". In what other terms would it be lighter than its nearest rival?

--Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 14:28, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Currently working on this article, though its getting late. Will return tomorrow. --Bulleid Pacific (talk) 00:48, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, now done. Article is due for a major overhaul anyway to prepare it for FA soon.--Bulleid Pacific (talk) 11:37, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That looks geat now, thanks. Good luck with the FAC! --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 14:28, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]