Talk:SM UB-5/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- The lead mentions that she is broken up twice (choose only one of them), but they also state two different years.
- The lead mentions 11 sunk ships, but I only count four in the prose and the list.
- I had adapted the text of the lead from that of SM UB-2 and failed to update the second sentence of the lead paragraph with UB-5's (rather than UB-2's) stats and fate. I have now corrected it. — Bellhalla (talk) 14:56, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- I am placing the article on hold until the above comments have been looked upon. Arsenikk (talk) 10:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for another review. I've commented on your objection above. — Bellhalla (talk) 14:56, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- Great work. I suspected it was a copy-and-paste error, but wanted to be certain. Congratulations with yet another good article. You are making a highly appreciated and valuable contribution to the encyclopædia. Arsenikk (talk) 22:32, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- I am placing the article on hold until the above comments have been looked upon. Arsenikk (talk) 10:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: