Jump to content

Talk:SM UB-14/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

I have reviewed this article. I found no gaping holes, MOS issues or anything substantial. The prose flows quite smoothly. Just one issue:

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    No mention of the year in the Aegean sea section. It might confuse the reader a bit. At least one would be nice.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
Thanks - DSachan (talk) 09:22, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've addressed the one issue you raised above. Thanks for the review. — Bellhalla (talk) 10:04, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]