Jump to content

Talk:SMS Viribus Unitis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSMS Viribus Unitis has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starSMS Viribus Unitis is part of the Battleships of Austria-Hungary series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 27, 2010Good article nomineeListed
December 6, 2010Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Comment

[edit]

My personal view is that there are too many disjointed articles on the Austro-Hungarian Navy. There is information on the Otranto Barrage and the main navy page which should be transferred here, unless duplicate information on numerous pages is acceptable, which I fear it is not. David Lauder 14:35, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Viribus Unitis/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

1. Well-written:

  • A: Prose - Minor Fail Pass
    • While the prose is generally good, there's a few minor issues with regards to sentence structure. The article could benefit from a light copyedit, mostly to tighten the prose.
There are still a few minor issues, but none significant enough to hold it back from GA. I would recommend a thorough copyedit if you wish to take the article further than GA.
  • B: MoS - Pass
    • No issues with MoS.

2: Factually accurate and verifiable:

  • A:References to sources - Pass
  • C: No Original Research - Pass
    • Everything looks good here.

3: Broad in its coverage

  • A: Addresses Topic - Pass
    • The topic is well addressed.
  • B: Focused - Minor issues Pass
    • I think the length of the "Characteristics" section could possibly be trimmed down a bit. Personally, I'd scrap the bit about the armoured belt, and combine the deficiency bit with the end of the armaments paragraph. Typically, you only give a very brief overview of the characteristics of the class. The best examples are here and here. Most of the characteristics stuff can be put into the overarching class article,
I think that I've fixed that....--White Shadows It's a wonderful life 02:05, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

4: Neutral - Pass

    • No issues here.

5: Stable - Pass

    • No evidence of edit-warring.

6: Images

  • A: Copyright Statuses - Minor issues
    • File:Vunitis-class.jpg - the copyright can only have expired if we know the date of the actual drawing. Either add the date to the drawing or eliminate the image from the article.
    • File:Vu1912.JPG - same issue. We don't know the dates of the author.
I've removed and replaced (the line drawing one) the images in question.--White Shadows It's a wonderful life 01:39, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • B: Relevance and Captions - Pass

Overall: On Hold Pass

Generally, the article's in pretty good shape. I'm giving the text a light copyedit, and there's a few other issues that need to be dealt with before it can pass its GA.

All the issues have been dealt with. This article is now GA! Well done! Cam (Chat)(Prof) 01:41, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Cam (Chat)(Prof) 01:14, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Name?

[edit]

Doesn't "Viribus unitis" mean "united forces" rather than "united peoples"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.137.90.170 (talk) 19:43, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yepp ÄDA - DÄP VA (talk) 17:20, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on SMS Viribus Unitis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The history book Paris 1919 by Margaret MacMillan (paperback edition, 2003 Random House, ISBN 0-375-76052-0, p285) says that "The following day an Italian torpedo boat darted into Pula and sank the dreadnought Viribus Unitis, the pride of the Austrian navy, killing its Yugoslav captain and crew." There is no mention of a submarine or limpet mines. The references for this paragraph in the book are ref. 12, Chapter 22, listed as: Zivojinovic, chapters 8-10; FRUS, vols. 1, pp. 475-87.

Hope that helps in some way. Billtubbs (talk) 02:24, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:SMS_Viribus_Unitis&oldid=1207869636"