Talk:SMS Triglav (1913)

SMS Triglav (1913) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 16, 2019. (Reviewed version).

Military history: Maritime / Balkan / European / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Balkan military history task force (c. 500–present)
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Austria Low‑importance

	Austria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Triglav/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 12:10, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do the batch. Parsecboy (talk) 12:10, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Link Pelagosa
Did she not participate in the attack on Italy in May 1915? If not, do you know why not? Parsecboy (talk) 18:31, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Not covered in my sources; we'd need those German-language books on A-H destroyers and torpedo boats to get an answer, I think.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:04, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - I had a look in Bilzer (see the ref in SMS Tiger (1887) for instance) and he says Triglav was guarding Sebenico during the attack. I can send you scans of the pages on the Tatras if you want - there are probably other details of her (and the other ships') activities not covered in the article. Parsecboy (talk) 10:24, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    - That would be great.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:51, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      - You've got mail! Parsecboy (talk) 15:46, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
        You sure? It looks to me like she's in Sebenico until 10 April and is then pulling security for the Ancona bombardment on 23/24 May, whatever exactly that means?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:19, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
        Ha, yeah, you're right - I misread it. That'll teach me to just glance at something ;) Parsecboy (talk) 12:13, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have any better idea of what Bilzer actually means by "Sicherung vor Ancona" on 23/24 May?

No, I'd interpret that as screening for the fleet. Parsecboy (talk) 14:47, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've added all relevant stuff from Bilzer.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:04, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I probably wouldn't have put a header there, since only one of the three paragraphs is about the bombardment, but I won't let that hold up promotion. Nice work as usual. Parsecboy (talk) 16:35, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]