Talk:SMS Strassburg

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SMS Strassburg article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

SMS Strassburg has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

SMS Strassburg is part of the Light cruisers of Germany series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 6, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
February 25, 2012	Good topic candidate	Promoted
March 16, 2014	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Military history: Maritime / European / German / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War I task force

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Strassburg/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Buggie111 (talk · contribs) 13:53, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	"mutinies"? I thought there was just one. "climactic", is that the right word for this? Consider creating/removing red links The mutinies started in Wilhelmshaven and spread to a number of other places over a long period of time, for a variety of reasons and differing groups (i.e., war weary sailors, Socialists, Communists, etc.), so plural is better. Do you have a better word instead of climactic? Red links are ok. The paragraphs look good. I said consider the redlinks. On the topic of climactic, I was thinking all-out, or just final. Buggie111 (talk) 21:09, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] I don't plan on creating any of the cruiser units at this point in time, I'll get to SMS Condor eventually, and the rest aren't really my specialty. Climactic and final have similar meanings in this context, and I don't think "all-out" sounds all that encyclopedic. Parsecboy (talk) 12:52, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Anything available on 1913-1914 service? It didn't occur to me until you said that, but she was the cruiser that went to South America with Kaiser and Konig Albert, which is well documented in their articles. Added a couple paragraphs on that.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	Some work to be done. Not much, though. Buggie111 (talk) 14:00, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

Here. Parsecboy (talk) 13:37, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Straßburg" in the Carribean misses

Coming back from the Pacific the Straßburg was released from the Detachierte Division in Santos, Brazil, since the Dresden needed help in the Caribbean. She arrived much later in Wilhelmshaven, just before the World War started. By this time the Division was already disbanded. - Andreas (talk) 12:52, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]