Jump to content

Talk:SMS Roon/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Nice article. Easily meets the GA requirements. I only saw a few minor issues that I went ahead and corrected. Good job! — Bellhalla (talk) 19:41, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your review, Bellhalla! Parsecboy (talk) 20:11, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]