Talk:SMS Prinzregent Luitpold/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:33, 11 January 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- No supporting cites for armor protection. You can either cite the specifics in the infobox or add a short descriptive paragraph with a cite.
- Citations added. Parsecboy (talk) 22:45, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- No supporting cites for armor protection. You can either cite the specifics in the infobox or add a short descriptive paragraph with a cite.
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- You've got three different speed figures in the lede, the infobox and the main body. Choose one and stick with it.
- Dang copy-paste errors...thanks for catching that. Parsecboy (talk) 22:45, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- You've got three different speed figures in the lede, the infobox and the main body. Choose one and stick with it.
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
