Talk:SMS Leopard (1885)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 01:23, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Well constructed, will come back shortly. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 01:23, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

• Section 1; Consistency maintained, all the parameters—Displacement, Length, Beam, Draft, Power, Propulsion, Speed, Armament and armor—seem fine. Conversion templates and link s in right place.
• Section 2; para 1; The commissioning date is never mentioned. Is it not available?
  • Not that I've seen anywhere - Conway's just gives the completion date, which is probably not the same. It's probably available in Sieche's book but I haven't been able to get my hands on a copy - there aren't many in the US.
• Section 2; para 1; Is it necessary to mention the 1875 to Don Juan d'Austria, as it is already linked previously.
  • Good catch, that one had been linked, and apparently I didn't remove all of it when I de-linked it.
• Section 2; para 3; then-Captain Anton Haus; suggest mentioning that Haus was the Commander of the Navy later, in parenthesis.
  • Good idea
• Lead; it is mentioned that she was armed with ten 47 mm (1.9 in) guns, but in the prose it was four 47 mm (1.9 in) quick-firing guns and six 47 mm revolver cannon, aren't these two different?
  • Yes, but for the purposes of the lead, it's ok to summarize them that way since they are all 47 mm guns.

Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:27, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for another review. Parsecboy (talk) 12:57, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

---

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:01, 28 November 2016 (UTC)