Jump to content

Talk:SMS Kaiser Wilhelm II/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:30, 3 July 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    watch your compound adjectives like 24-centimeter in the lead. Just add |adj=on if you're using a template. Shouldn't it be "the" flagship in the lead? And no 4th February, just 4 February. Might be worthwhile to add decomissioning dates to the career infobox, but that's your call.
    I fixed the convert template and the 4th Feb (probably something I missed when I rewrote the article) and added the date the ship was struck (I don't have a specific decommissioning date). Isn't it already "the flagship"? Parsecboy (talk) 10:36, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: