This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Prose is fine but there are a few issues in the Collision section. There seems to be an issue over the placement of the sentences, they seem out of order. One example is Two men were seriously injured while fighting the fire, and a third died of his injuries, shouldn't that be a few sentences back in the text? There are other examples like this one all throughout this section. According to Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), when doing conversions, you should use standard abbreviations: for example, miles -> mi, kilometers squared -> km2, and pounds -> lb (I got this last one from the automated tips in a PR section, if you think otherwise then just tell me, this is not a deal breaker or anything, just a bit of advice)--White ShadowsI ran away from you23:58, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I moved a couple of sentences around; how does that look now? As for conversions, I'm not really sure what you're talking about. Can you point anything out? Parsecboy (talk) 00:37, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Examples like this may or may not exist in the text, (I got it from the PR suggestions page) I personally do not see any glaring issues so I'll pass this section of the criteria. If you plan on taking this to ACR or FAC, then someone else may find an issue but I don't see anything that is a red flag according to the GAC.--White ShadowsI ran away from you01:14, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I generally avoid websites with the exception of navweaps. Most everything you find online isn't reliable, and it's not worth the time sorting through them to find one that might be. As for citations in the infobox, I added one to the notes section. Parsecboy (talk) 00:37, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]