Jump to content

Talk:SMS Kaiser Barbarossa/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Anotherclown (talk) 16:51, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comments

[edit]

Looks good so far, some minor points though:

  • There are no citation errors and external links check out (no action required),
  • One dab link (to Schichau) which needs to rectified; and  Done
  • The prose is a little wooden in places but this won't hold it back in my opinion.

More to follow. Anotherclown (talk) 17:09, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Overall summary

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    Well referenced.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    Well referenced.
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
Overall, another good article IMO. Well done. Anotherclown (talk) 17:19, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for taking the time to review the article, Anotherclown. Parsecboy (talk) 17:21, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Anotherclown (talk) 17:28, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]