Talk:SMS Baden/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 06:31, 18 May 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- Break-up the sequence of Baden... Baden... Baden... in the Scapa Flow section.
- Fixed. Parsecboy (talk) 11:19, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
- Break-up the sequence of Baden... Baden... Baden... in the Scapa Flow section.
- B. MoS compliance:
- Use the chapter= for the Baden article title in Warship
- Added. Parsecboy (talk) 11:19, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
- It was still messed up; ya gotta think of a volume of Warship as an anthology of articles, each with their own author and title. Fixed it for you regardless.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 06:55, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
- Added. Parsecboy (talk) 11:19, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
- Use the chapter= for the Baden article title in Warship
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- I've added a clarification note on the beginning of the mutiny. Did the ships sail or not?
- Should be more clear now. Let me know if there's anything else I could add. Parsecboy (talk) 11:19, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
- I've added a clarification note on the beginning of the mutiny. Did the ships sail or not?
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
