Talk:SMS Arminius

SMS Arminius has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

SMS Arminius is part of the Ironclad warships of Germany series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 13, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed
February 25, 2012	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Military history: Maritime / European / German

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Arminius/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:36, 12 March 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Publisher locations needed in refs.
Added. Parsecboy (talk) 23:51, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
Were the Krupp guns muzzle or breech-loaders? And I presume that they were rifled, right? Link to Penn and armored frigate.
Same as in Friedrich Carl - I can't find any more information on the guns. Links added. Parsecboy (talk) 23:51, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
No photos available on the net?
Same as Friedrich Carl again. Parsecboy (talk) 23:51, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Add the photo on commons and we'll be done here.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:39, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There's no source for that, and according to the WI article by Sullivan, the WZ-Bilddienst holds the copyright. When I get around to it, I'm actually going to nominate it for deletion based on that. Parsecboy (talk) 00:53, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your call, but I'd like to see something, even a fair-use scan from Groener.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:27, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]