Talk:SEI Investments Company

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name

The official name of our company is SEI Investments Co. (see <ref>http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/overview?symbol=SEIC.O</ref> as a reference) How do I change the title of this page?

Thanks! Bcoopersei (talk) 15:50, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SEI is part of the Allen Stanford fraud: they are defendents in an ongoing class action suit (reference below)

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sns-rt-stanfordclassaction-update-1l1e8ejf9n-20120319,0,2192598.story?page=2

Here is the suit naming SEI: http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx?xmldoc=In%20FCO%2020120319110.xml&docbase=CSLWAR3-2007-CURR

This should be added under a "legal" heading of some sort

Nofway (talk) 15:49, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry it took almost 4 years for anybody to reply. I have added it to the history section. I don't think it deserves a section of its own.

I assume the case is still ongoing? The latest I found was an article from late 2015 in which it was. --DanielRigal (talk) 20:39, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This article seems PR written. Lacking objectivity

"""" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.140.254.108 (talk) 18:28, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. This has been allowed to be too bad for too long. I intend to gut out the gushing drivel. --DanielRigal (talk) 19:39, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --DanielRigal (talk) 20:39, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

This is currently scoring 62.5% on Earwig's Copyvio Detector against https://www.seic.com/enUS/about/580.htm. I propose to remove that stuff as well. Will there be much left afterwards? Lets see. --DanielRigal (talk) 19:50, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also done. Now scoring 33.8% although that is coming from an SEI press release, which suggests that there is still far too much insider content here. It is considerably better than it was though. If anybody can do more to improve it then knock yourselves out. I'm done with this for now. --DanielRigal (talk) 20:39, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://seic.com/enUS/about/580.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:58, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]