Talk:Södermanland Runic Inscription 113

A request has been made for this article to be peer reviewed to receive a broader perspective on how it may be improved. Please make any edits you see fit to improve the quality of this article.

Södermanland Runic Inscription 113 has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 29, 2022. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Södermanland Runic Inscription 113 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 May 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Södermanland Runic Inscription 113 (pictured) was found in 1856 when a burial mound was dug up as part of new cultivation?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/May. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Södermanland Runic Inscription 113.

Norse history and culture Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norse history and culture, a WikiProject related to all activities of the North Germanic peoples, both in Scandinavia and abroad, prior to the formation of the Kalmar Union in 1397. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Norse history and cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Norse history and cultureTemplate:WikiProject Norse history and cultureNorse history and culture
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 17:42, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Södermanland Runic Inscription 113

... that Södermanland Runic Inscription 113 (pictured) was found in 1856 when a burial mound was dug up as part of new cultivation? Source: https://sormlandsmuseum.se/globalassets/pdf-lista---rapporter/arkeologi/2013/13-stenkvista-kolunda.pdf - page 9. search for 1856. It's in Swedish. I'm so sorry.
- ALT1: ... that ...? Source:
- Reviewed: Anne Gunn
- Comment: I think that's the obvious hook. Trying to help out the International Museum Day celebrations at Sörmland Museum. Created by Adam Cuerden (talk). Self-nominated at 03:27, 15 May 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Working on this on priority Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 05:26, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: ~~IMHO Not must but you can include an image since seems available.~~ Source is in Swedish language checked with Google translator, seems reasonably acceptable. It would be good to go live on May 18th as DYK author wishes. I hope/ request other users who know how to make it appear on May 18th will help out. Sorry It was my observation loss Image is already there. Cheers Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 05:58, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The source is acceptable, and the article is sufficiently long. Nice work! Haiiya (talk) 06:32, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My thanks to both of you! Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.8% of all FPs} 20:17, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GAN note

I am aware the article is on the short side, but it's also a relatively small subject. I think, given the nature of the monument, it's comprehensive. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.8% of all FPs} 23:21, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]