Talk:S'well

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

I agree with Smartse, the page was worded pretty promotionally from the get go. But I think cutting it down to eight sentences without reworking the actual press is a little much. I combed through the references and they get a fair amount of news in publications including Fortune, Bloomberg, CNN etc. I had added a pop culture section a little while ago after coming across an article that associated the product more as a big trend with a notable following of celebrities etc., but I can see how that'd be promotional too. Adding back neutral facts S3venevan (talk) 13:06, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I revised the information a little in a userspace here, not much could be added back due its promotional nature S3venevan (talk) 15:39, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]