Talk:Rydal, New South Wales

Australia: Places / New South Wales Low‑importance

	Australia portal Rydal, New South Wales is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian places (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

I wonder if Rydal would be better classified as a "village" rather than a "town". If so the "Village" subcategory would need to be created for proper "Template:Infobox Australian place | type = village …" rendering.

The same would hold for Tarana. While both these villages have a pub, railway station, rural fire service and church(es), neither have shops, town hall or other community resources. As such it seems inappropriate to classify them as towns. -- gtsWiki^talk 03:34, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You would be best placed to raise discussion of this issue at Template talk:Infobox Australian place and Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board, where you will find more people who watch those pages. My own opinion is that while I take your point, the issue of how we define a "town" as opposed to a "village" would be fraught with difficulty and likely breach one of Wikipedia's core policies, WP:No original research. -- Cheers, Mattinbgn\^talk 03:47, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I have started this discussion as suggested. -- gtsWiki^talk 08:04, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]