Talk:Rycote House

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture: Historic houses Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Low-importance).

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to merge. Alanl (talk) 09:43, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I propose that this stub article be absorbed into the article about Rycote. Rycote consists of little except Rycote House, St. Michael's chapel and a country estate including a lake. The histories of the house and chapel are closely intertwined and therefore arguably should be in a single article. Until a manorial history of Rycote is published, there is little to put in the Rycote article except the history of the house and chapel. Therefore the house and chapel should be documented in the main Rycote article rather than separate articles of their own. Motacilla (talk) 18:36, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge. (Actually redirect—see below.) Deor (talk) 15:09, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. It does look easy to expand the article. See for example http://www.thamehistory.net/places/RycotePalace.htm . Charles Matthews (talk) 15:16, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

At the discretion of editors, more information about this place can indeed be added to the encyclopedia, but I agree with Motacilla that a better place for it is in the Rycote article, which already contains all the information presented here and more. I've therefore emended my opinion above to clarify that changing this article to a redirect is the only action that's really needed in this case. Deor (talk) 22:46, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge: Rycote is an estate not a hamlet. Verica Atrebatum (talk) 22:12, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The result of this discussion was to merge

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Merged per nom. Nothing to copy (everything in Rycote House was already in Rycote). Dave.Dunford (talk) 11:23, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]