Talk:Rutherford's Monument
Appearance
A fact from Rutherford's Monument appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 April 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help! |
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Lightburst (talk) 15:16, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the 56 foot-high monument (pictured) to the theologian Samuel Rutherford near his parish church at Anwoth, Scotland, was badly damaged by a lightning strike just five years after its 1842 construction? Source: Local history website; also supported by the Gifford and Hume offline sources.
Created by Girth Summit (talk). Self-nominated at 15:07, 19 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Rutherford's Monument; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- Hi Girth Summit (talk), I do love these local monuments across the country, their history is so interesting. Review: article moved to mainspace 18 April and exceeds minimum length (even with quotations removed); article is well written; inline citations are used throughout (I was not familiar with the Gatehouse of Fleet but am satisfied it is reliable enough for the content cited, as a local historical charity carrying out work to the monument, and if it is backed up by the offline sources); I didn't pick up on any overly close paraphrasing from the sources; hook fact is interesting, mentioned in the article and checks out to source cited, I added the "Scotland" to give the reader a bit of a steer on where it is; image is the author's own and appropriately licensed. Looks fine to me - Dumelow (talk) 07:26, 20 April 2023 (UTC)