Talk:Russian monitor Tifon/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: ErrantX (talk · contribs) 11:55, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
500+ Good Articles in, there's not going to be much.. but am happy to review this.
- Might be worth mentioning in the lead she was steam powered
- but the rifling project was seriously delayed and the ship was completed with nine-inch smoothbores; was this the original smoothbores? Or some others?
- Clarified.
- license-built; WL to Licensed production?
- Done.
- just as in the Passaic-class ships; the lead says The design was based on the American Passaic-class monitor, but this is the only mention in the article prose. Is there anything to expand on here?
- Only minorly.
- Unlike their predecessors, the Uragans were built without deck armor to save weight, but Tifon was modified for the addition of 0.5-inch (12.7 mm) armor plates after completion, but it is unknown if they were ever fitted; fragments and "but" twice - consider revising
- Tweaked.
- The ship was subsequently broken up in Finland; but hadn't she been returned to the Soviets? Any more context to add here.
- I wish, but she was pretty worthless by this time and my sources don't have any fuller information.
Nice little article. --Errant (chat!) 11:55, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks; I think that I've addressed everything, see if they suit. And thanks for looking this over.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:21, 30 October 2015 (UTC)