Talk:Russian battleship Knyaz Suvorov

Russian battleship Knyaz Suvorov has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 28, 2011	Good article nominee	Not listed
December 21, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
October 14, 2019	WikiProject A-class review	Approved
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 12, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Russian battleship Knyaz Suvorov was the flagship of Admiral Rozhestvensky at the Battle of Tsushima?
Current status: Good article

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Military history: Maritime / Russian & Soviet / Operation Majestic Titan

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	Operation Majestic Titan (Phase I)

Additional information:
/
	This article has passed an A-Class review.

Russia: Technology & engineering / History / Military Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.

Destroyer Buiny and survivors

There were both Knyaz Suvorov battleship officers and squadron staff officers on the Knyaz Suvorov. While squadron staff officers (those who were alive by that time) moved to destroyer (this is OK because squadron staff may be transferred to another ship of the squadron), Knyaz Suvorov's officers stayed on the battleship.

Noel Fairchild Busch. The Emperor's sword: Japan vs. Russia in the Battle of Tsushima. [1]

Three members of Rozhdestvensky's staff — de Colongue, Semenoff, and Flag Lieutenant Leontiev — jumped across to the destroyer at the same time, as did a dozen or so of the Suvorov seamen.

J. N. Westwood. Witnesses of Tsushima [2]

Although a handful of the SUVOROV'S crew had jumped on to the BUINY, already overcrowded with more than 200 survivors from the OSLYABYA, most stayed aboard, including the three remaining officers."

[3]

When destroyer “Buinyi” approached the battered flagman “Suvorov” to pick up the wounded Rozhestvensky and his staff officers, lieutenants Bogdanov and Vyrubov, both officers from the “Suvorov”, and the still able-bodied sailors asked the destroyer commander to move away from the doomed battleship...

With current revision "..took off the wounded officers from Knyaz Suvorov, including Rozhestvensky, leaving an unwounded midshipman in command..." reader may get impression that some of the Knyaz Suvorov officers left their ship and crew, and that is just wrong. --DonaldDuck (talk) 05:58, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have to look at your sources.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 08:21, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]