Talk:Russian–Syrian hospital bombing campaign

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Russian–Syrian hospital bombing campaign article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS

The article Russian–Syrian hospital bombing campaign, along with other pages relating to the Syrian Civil War and ISIL, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are:

Limit of one revert in 24 hours: This article is under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24-hour period)

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.

Remedy instructions and exemptions

Enforcement procedures:

Violations of any restrictions (excluding 1RR/reverting violations) and other conduct issues should be reported to the administrators' incidents noticeboard. Violations of revert restrictions should be reported to the administrators' edit warring noticeboard.
Editors who violate any listed restrictions may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.
An editor must be aware before they can be sanctioned.

With respect to any reverting restrictions:

Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions. In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion.
Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as clear vandalism.
Clear vandalism of any origin may be reverted without restriction.
Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors that are not vandalism are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Middle East B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

B

This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Middle Eastern military history task force

Russia High‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Syria High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 April 2017. The result of the discussion was keep.

A fact from Russian–Syrian hospital bombing campaign appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 June 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Russia has denied claims that it has attacked hospitals in Syria?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2017/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Russian-Syrian hospital bombing campaign.

Wikipedia

Neutrality

I'm a bit concerned that pretty much this whole article is about allegations of a hospital bombing campaign by Russia/Syria, while only two sentences address Russia/Syria's denials and any uncertainty surrounding who may be behind the campaign. I will note that I have no opinion on this subject beyond the relative unbalanced treatment in the article. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 05:14, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Would the above editor suggest, that the multiple denials of the Syrian Government, and Russian government be included after each attack?--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 05:41, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May I inquire what "ideas, incidents, and controversies" have been given undue weight, as alleged by this tag? What needs to be fixed specifically?--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 01:21, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@RightCowLeftCoast: Just saw you remove this tag...fine by me; idk why but I'm not really seeing the issues I saw when I tagged anymore. For what it's worth, though, I posted my rationale for tagging right here in this section, so it was hardly a drive by tagging. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 18:56, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No worries.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 20:10, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source does verify removed content

I kindly ask the Coffee (talk · contribs) to reverse the removal of the content here. If you look at the source it says

There have been 252 attacks on Syrian health care centers in 2016 so far, according to the Syrian American Medical Society, a nonprofit organization.

; it further states

The rate of assaults doubled after Russia’s military intervention in the conflict in September 2015, the medical society’s figures show. And nearly 200 occurred after May 3, when the United Nations Security Council adopted a resolution strongly condemning violence against those providing and receiving medical treatment in the country.

The content that was removed said

As of December 2016, medical facilities were attacked over 200 times by Russian and Syrian forces.

Therefore, I repeat the request that the removed content be re-added.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 05:40, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The source does not state that the 200 attacks were by Russian/Syrian forces. 2601:644:0:DBD0:D6C:3BE8:9238:8176 (talk) 19:43, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hospital bombed less than 24 hours after coordinates were given to the UN

There was an article on Syrian hospital(s) bombed by Russia or the Syrian regime less than 24 hours after coordinates were given to the UN. It was approximately 6 hours after the location was shared with the UN. I hope someone can find and list it. Thank you. Caesar116 (talk) 20:32, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, WHO supplied the locations of the hospitals to the United Nations?

WHY would they give the UN the locations?

WHERE did the evidence come from that Syrian hospital(s) where "bombed by Russia or the Syrian regime less than 24 hours after coordinates were given to the UN"?

For why would anyone want to push information that paints the UN in such a very bad? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.69.169.103 (talk) 21:01, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]