This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
A fact from Russell J. Rickford appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 December 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
NY post isn't a reliable source either. I've seen the video, and I can see this being a controversy of note, but we're going to need reliable sourcing and NPOV writing. HeroofTime55 (talk) 23:20, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The New York Post has shown itself, on matters of national interest at least, to be a far more reliable source than the Gray Lady down the road.
Time after time, people pooh-pooh the Post's reporting and laud the NYT's partisan takes.
Then, two years later, the NYT runs a piece saying, 'well, it turns out this is how it really was, not how we initially reported and opined on it.' 50.54.71.191 (talk) 14:18, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I attended the speech in person, and believe NY Post (along with the person who originally filmed the clip) have taken it out of context maliciously. Rickford spoke for upwards of 20 minutes and explicitly condemned violence against civilians, though to my knowledge no one recorded the speech in full. The current language should be removed. 4stringfender (talk) 01:54, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If he condemned violence, and then followed up with "I am exhilarated by what Hamas did" Then his condemnation is more worthless than he is.there is jo need to see a full recording, what was recorded tells the world all it needs to know. 2A0D:6FC7:55C:92B1:978:5634:1232:5476 (talk) 09:13, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
This article is clearly biased and takes his words out of context. He was excited and exhilarated by the acts of resistance of palestinians breaking down a harmful and communcally destructive border wall, not referring to hamas’ wrongdoing 147.129.22.205 (talk) 17:18, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. RudolfRed (talk) 19:00, 17 October 2023 (UTC)