Talk:Rupert Penry-Jones

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rupert Penry-Jones article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Spooks Mid‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Spooks task force.

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Theatrical erection

the article in which he confirms the erection and mentions hampstead doesn't mention "the play about the baby". that play premiered at the almeida and has never been staged at hampstead, so cannot be the play he was talking about in the interview.

it does however contain textual reference's to the male state of arousal (!) so perhaps that why the confusion has ... arisen? Amo (talk) 22:48, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If one had read the preamble to the discussion of Penry-Jones's interview with the Sunday Times it would clearly state that the performance that the editor was discussing with Penry-Jones was that of the 'The Play About the Baby' as the interaction is based on an article from Wikipedia as I quote from the Times' Editor 'his story might be an urban myth - my source was the notoriously unreliable Wikipedia' if the essence of the discussion was this revolving around the topic of Jones's nude performance with an aroused member; the article needs no more verification as the words are from the mouth of the performer, Rupert Penry-Jones who by his own admission and for comical effect; states that '..It wasn’t the Almeida, it was the Hampstead Theatre” so the article and mentioning of the performance should alter to the fact that Penry-Jones was both performing at the HAMPSTEAD and not the ALMEIDA and that similarly he was rather aroused for the performance as he says '..I got bored with the play. So I started making sure I was slightly excited..' I will leave the ball in your court (no pun intended!) but I would and am considering re-introducing the somewhat controversial admission. PoliceChief (talk) 15:37, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

would you be able to clarify that for me that in plain and concise english please? I don't understand what you want to do. if you are suggesting that because the article doesn't state that it wasn't tbatb that it must have been that play? Amo (talk) 20:53, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If the topic had occured between the Times' editor and Penry-Jones to the discussion of his nude role at the Hampstead; considering that seemingly he had done no either nude performances on stage it would be conclusive to state that it was 'The Play About the Baby' that the editor and Penry-Jones was discussing performed at the Hampstead. PoliceChief (talk) 23:47, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

right, and how would you be inclined to deal with a source that suggested the play has only been performed, in london, at the almeida? Amo (talk) 00:09, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spooks data

Aside from a brief mention that he was in Spooks, there seems to be very little data re when he joined, when he left etc. He was in the programme for 4 years so a fairly large chunk of his career, nearly a third in fact, which in my view deserves a paragraph or two. Glowplug1 (talk) 02:21, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you go to BAFTA, there is a list of BAFTA members. Despite all his shows, he is not a member of BAFTA. Odd. I wonder why he is being blackballed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.183.227.233 (talk) 20:47, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rupert Penry-Jones. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090409070859/http://www.thebookseller.com/news/68347-rankin-and-p-d-james-pick-up-itv3-awards.html to http://www.thebookseller.com/news/68347-rankin-and-p-d-james-pick-up-itv3-awards.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:16, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]