Talk:Royalty-free

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Royalty-free article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Business

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Extending coverage of article

This page is just about photos- we should widen it to have similar detail on other media.

Also- it mentions "music loop samples"- but not all royalty-free music is a loop, or a sample.

Is there any website that offers free photographs for use in websites without charging anything at all. What do you call such photos where no initial fee is paid or any other charge at all. I thought this was the meaning of royalty free. rodze7 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.15.123.166 (talk) 06:29, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The page includes: "... the larger pixel size of a digital image, the larger the fee..." "size" is the wrong word. "dimensions" would be more correct as in, "... the larger pixel DIMENSIONS of a digital image, the larger the fee..." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gdanmitchell (talk • contribs) 23:25, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I had thought the scope of this page should be widened to clearly include photography and artwork, video, music, etc. But now I see that there's another page titled "Royalty-Free Music". Any thoughts on how these should be categorized? Syrup patrol (talk) 20:13, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The page states: "In stock photography RF is one of the four common licenses or business models together with Rights Managed, subscription and micro." Both subscription and micro[stock] use the RF license model. They are different ways of selling the licenses, not different licenses themselves. I suggest this line be removed as it is confusing to those wanting to understand Royalty Free. The unfortunate name is confusing enough! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.137.165.212 (talk) 18:11, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clean up

have done some cleanup at the Rights Managed article, will do the same for this one.--SasiSasi (talk) 15:02, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]