Talk:Royalton Hotel

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hotels Low‑importance

	Hotels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hotels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the hospitality industry, including hotels, motels, resorts, and destination spas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HotelsWikipedia:WikiProject HotelsTemplate:WikiProject HotelsHotels
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Royalton Hotel appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 February 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the lobby of the Royalton Hotel was once compared to an ocean liner?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Royalton Hotel.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 10:20, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Royalton Hotel

... that in the 1980s, Philippe Starck was hired to design a renovation of the Royalton Hotel due to his lack of experience with hotel design? Source: Weinraub, Judith (October 13, 1988). "Superstar Starck's High-Style Hotel". The Washington Post. p. T11.
- ALT1: ... that in the 1980s, Philippe Starck was hired to redesign the Royalton Hotel because he had little hotel-design experience? Source: Weinraub, Judith (October 13, 1988). "Superstar Starck's High-Style Hotel". The Washington Post. p. T11.
- ALT2: ... that in the 1980s, Ian Schrager repainted a room at the Royalton Hotel 40 times before deciding on a color? Source: Freedman, Alix (January 19, 1989). "White-Collar Chic: Studio 54 Partners Are Even More Successful As New York Hoteliers --- With Prison Behind Them, Rubell and Schrager Now Are Toasts of the Town --- 'Statement of the '80s and '90s'". Wall Street Journal. p. 1.
- ALT3: ... that the lobby of the Royalton Hotel was once compared to an ocean liner? Source: Freedman, Alix (January 19, 1989). "White-Collar Chic: Studio 54 Partners Are Even More Successful As New York Hoteliers --- With Prison Behind Them, Rubell and Schrager Now Are Toasts of the Town --- 'Statement of the '80s and '90s'". Wall Street Journal. p. 1.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Cesar Vergara

5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 20:09, 20 January 2023 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: - Not done
Overall: @Epicgenius: Good article. Just waiting on a QPQ. Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:20, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Approve now that QPQ has been added. Onegreatjoke (talk) 00:01, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]