Talk:Royal Trux
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]"The idiosyncratic album offered skeletal projections of songs that betrayed a singular logic groomed on bizarre and previously unconnected realms of the rock canon." is such a fucking pretentious rock critic line. It doesnt belong in an online encyclopedia. Asshole. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.3.8.253 (talk) 21:06, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
-- I agree that this page needs to be better written. If you're unhappy with the article, why not register and edit the page? It would be more productive than anonymously calling someone an 'asshole'. Tomclarke
This entire article has the POV of "corporate industry sucked the life out of the underground scene." You might want to tone it down a little. MPS 04:06, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- as the POV is correct i disagree on the need for any down toning —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.125.110.223 (talk) 21:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
It's obvious that a huge RTX fan wrote this. I don't know much about the band, but that intro really needs to be made more neutral. ~ This page was much better before some neutral person made it neutral and uninformative and boring. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.77.73.66 (talk) 01:53, 30 July 2008 (UTC)