Jump to content

Talk:Royal Scots

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeRoyal Scots was a Warfare good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 6, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed

Image from main article

[edit]
Pipes & Drums of the Royal Scots
Pipes & Drums of the Royal Scots

NB: The photograph on the right hand side is probably of a civilian pipe band not of the Pipes and Drums of the Royal Scots Regiment of the British Army. Drummers in the Royal Scots Regiment did not wear kilts (it was Lowland regiment not a Highland regiment), the crest on the base drum is wrong (the Royal Scots badge is based on the St Andrew's Cross) and the Glengarry cap is wrong also. Compare it to a photo of the real thing here; http://www.penicuikwhatson.co.uk/royal%20scots/DSCF0035.jpg

Failed GA nomination

[edit]

This article has not yet reached good article status, for the following reasons:

  • While it exhaustively records the deployments of the regiment, it lacks many other details about its history. For instance: What tactics did it employ and what roles did it fill? Was it distinguished in battle? What effect did it have on history? See, for instance, 2nd Battalion 9th Marines for an example of a conscise history that provides more context and detail beyond just where the unit went.
  • The article needs more images. For a regiment with such a long history, illustrations, photos, and commanders' portaits should be available.
  • The "Alliances" section is not explained adequately. What does it mean that thes regiment is allied with these others?
  • "Battle honours" needs some cleanup, including wikilinks on the relevant battles.

Twinxor t 03:50, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • The discussion of the regiment's early history is very unclear. What exactly was it doing in France between 1633 and 1662? For whom was it fighting, if it was fighting.
    • The Royal Scots between 1633 and 1662 was almost part of the French Army, so fighting for France. It could be seen that the oldest infantry regiment of the British Army was at its early days, a scottish unit for French service. 90.42.226.11 (talk) 18:23, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's also a bit worrying that so many references occur to England. Scotland was legally a separate country until 1707 and there was great friction with England in the early years of the regiment's existence. It seems unlikely that it would have been on the "English" establishment.

Reply probably between 1625 and 1649 Charles I was king of England scotland and wales — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.98.158.58 (talk) 22:25, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mutiny?

[edit]

Text: "both battalions of the regiment mutinied and were disarmed". Hardly a muntiny, as James II was the lawful King, and Willam of Orange an usurper. Luke 84.23.155.84 (talk) 20:29, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Royal Scots. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:57, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Royal Scots. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:30, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

16th Battalion Website

[edit]

For consideration as an inclusion to the article - the website link to the 16th Battalion.

http://www.mccraesbattaliontrust.org.uk/

G Tait Chairman of the McCrae's Battalion Trust 94.174.206.11 (talk) 10:58, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Royal Scots. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:11, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Royal Scots. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:16, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Tangier, where it won its first battle honour."

[edit]

This statement is misleading. However meritorious the service of the regiment in Morocco, the granting of the campaign honour 'Tangier,' oft cited as an contemporaneous event, was not awarded until 1908. JF42 (talk) 17:10, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pontius Pilate's Body Guard

[edit]

"The Royal Scots replied that they provided the guard to Pontius Pilate who, according to legend, was Scottish having been born at Fortingall."

This version bears little relation to the most commonly told accounts of how this nickname originated. See Scottish National Dictionary:

PONTIUS PILATE'S BODYGUARD, n. A jocular nickname for the Royal Scots Regiment said to have been given c.1635 during the Thirty Years' War by French troops to Hepburn's Regiment, the ancestor of the Royal Scots (see quots.).

Sc. 1851  J. Grant Memoirs, Sir J. Hepburn 236: The Regiment de Picardie treated these claims to antiquity with ridicule, as being somewhat overstrained, and gave Hepburn's corps the sobriquet of Pontius Pilate's Guard, which the Royal Scots retain at the present day.

Sc. 1918  H. Maxwell, Lowland Sc. Reg. 132: The French officers . . . gave them in derision the nickname of “Pontius Pilate's Bodyguard”, a nickname which sticks to the Royal Scots to this day. It was in one of these disputes that an officer of Hepburn's made the famous retort that the Picardy regiment must be mistaken, for had the Scots really been Pontius Pilate's Guard and done duty at the sepulchre, the Holy Body had never left it. http://www.dsl.ac.uk/entry/snd/pontius_pilates_bodyguard

See also:

On one occasion, a sharp dispute on some contested point of honour, a Scottish cavalier of Heoburn’s said, laughingly, to an officer of the regiment de Picardie – “We must be mistaken, Monsieur; for, had we really been the guards of Monsieur Pontius Pilate, and done duty at the sepulchre, the Holy Body had never left it;” implying that Scottish sentinels would not have slept on their posts, whereas those of the regiment de Picardie did.

'Memoirs and adventures of Sir John Hepburn' By James Grant, 1851 (p.236)

and:

‘...had we really been the guards of Monsieur Pontius Pilate and done duty at the Sepulchre, the Holy Body had never left it.'

'The regimental records of the Royal Scots' J.C. Leask & H.M. McCance, 1915

JF42 (talk) 10:42, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:51, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Royal_Scots&oldid=1242126674"