Talk:Royal Oldham Hospital

	Greater Manchester portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hospitals Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hospitals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hospitals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HospitalsWikipedia:WikiProject HospitalsTemplate:WikiProject HospitalsHospital
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Royal Oldham Hospital. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090204165424/http://www.workhouses.org.uk/index.html?Oldham%2FOldham1881.shtml to http://www.workhouses.org.uk/index.html?Oldham%2FOldham1881.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:49, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merger

Proposal: merge Radio Cavell into Royal Oldham Hospital.

This has a terrible amount of detail, and is not clearly notable. It has been tagged for over a decade for various issues. Let's just merge it, which should be non-controversial. Bearian (talk) 20:40, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I think a case could be made for its notability as the birthplace of Louise Brown. And in recent weeks, sadly, Greater Manchester has been at the epicentre of the COVID crisis in the UK. Just my view. Dormskirk (talk) 23:05, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Dormskirk: The proposal is to merge Radio Cavell into Royal Oldham Hospital (but I agree that wasn't made very clear). The hospital is definitely notable. Lennart97 (talk) 22:53, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support redirecting Radio Cavell to Royal Oldham Hospital, as there's no reliably sourced content to merge. Lennart97 (talk) 22:53, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support redirecting Radio Cavell to Royal Oldham Hospital, (I understand now). Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 23:41, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done, Radio Cavell now redirects here and is mentioned in the lead. Lennart97 (talk) 20:16, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have just made a minor edit of the paragraph on Radio Cavell (to correct form of name and highlight it is a hospital radio service). I don't believe that there is anything controversial in the changes made, I'm just highlighting here that as I have a professional connection to the organisation and wanted to be transparent over motive of making the edit is solely to improve readability. Philedmondsuk (talk) 21:39, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]