Jump to content

Talk:Royal Norwegian Navy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Some history would be good; I came here from the Krag-Petersson article (currently on the front page) because I'd seen that the RNN adopted the rifle in 1876, but as far as I can tell there's nothing at all about the 19th-century RNN. Loganberry (Talk) 22:44, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is the RNoN official web page for history. This page has a day by day history of the RNoN from 1814 to 2005. They are unfortunately both in Norwegian. Inge 17:21, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Torpedo boat, Motor torpedo boat, Missile boat, Missile torpedo boat...

[edit]

Just a collection of labels that are available for these boatsInge 16:10, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

List of ships

[edit]

OK the list was getting a bit too big :), but the schools and present ships still belong in this article.Inge 21:07, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, the page was too cluttered. You may be right about having the present stuff there. kallemax 07:12, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merger

[edit]

No to a merger. Separate pages for each branch works very good. The Navy article needs to stay separate. Inge 22:21, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All such comments should be at: Talk:Norwegian Defence Force —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 15:09, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

KNM

[edit]

KNM stands for "Kongelig Norsk Marine". If it were to stand for "Kongelige Norske Marine" one would have to add "Den" in front. "Kongelig Norsk Marine" means Royal Norwegian Navy, "Den Kongelige Norske Marine" means The Royal Norwegian Navy.Inge 14:45, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is very difficult to find references to this on internet, because KNM is almost never written in its full form. It is just one of those things you are supposed to know I guess. Googling will get you 28 hits on Kongelig Norsk Marine and 437 for Kongelige Norske Marine, that is because Den Kongelige Norske Marine is the definite form. But in the pamphlet Fakta om Forsvaret 2006 issued by the Ministry of Defense ISBN 978-82-7924-0580 Parameter error in {{ISBN}}: checksum-7 KNM is explained as standing for Kongelig Norsk Marine. Also an article explaining. Inge 19:41, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Facts about the Defense"

[edit]

This year's pamphlet "Fakta om Forsvaret" (Facts about the Defense) has arrived. I will try to update as much as I can according to it.Inge 12:11, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

KNM Tordenskjold and KNM Harald Haarfagre

[edit]

We normally substitute KNM with HNoMS when we name Norwegian naval ships in English. This does not apply to the two schools named after former ships. KNM Harald Haarfagre is translated Royal Norwegian Naval Basic Training Establishment, and KNM Tordenskjold is translated Royal Norwegian Naval Training Establishment. It's not a biggie, but these are the offical translations. Inge 10:41, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

KV

[edit]

Since "KV" stands for Kongelig Vaktjeneste (Kongelig means Royal), shouldn't then the English version be Royal Norwegian Coast Guard, not Norwegian Coast Guard? Manxruler 13:28, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was under the impression that KV simply stood for Kystvakt ("coast guard"). -- Nidator 15:44, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

KV stands for Kystvakt, Coast Guard. I know several people whom have worked/and work in te Kystvakt. There has although been intepreded at Kongelig Vaktjenste (Royal Watch Duty) in some citations (Where I have come a cross one of them), I am under te belief that this predates the date when Kystvakt was established (After 12 nautical mile zone and 200 mile Economic Exclusive Zone) and hence establishment just after. The Kystvakt is funded by The Justicedepartement but the ships receive KNM as Royal Norwegian Navy vessels when tasked abroad (Relates to predominately the Nordkapp Class). The chairs turn and the ships of the Coast Guard are tasked as military if a conflict/war brakes out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by STP-Norway (talk • contribs) 06:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Two LPDs?!

[edit]

It would greatly surprise me if the RNoN got two LPDs. As I understand it the two logistics ships that are planned is an AOR and a ro-ro vessel. -- Nidator 15:51, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Why do all the links to different submarine classes link to the same page? Would it not be better to show a red link?Marcusroos (talk) 19:09, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would think so, yes. The present order is poor. Manxruler (talk) 22:47, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wars

[edit]

I have added the Cold war and the War on Terror to the list of engadgments. I beleve it is appropriate. Mortyman (talk) 03:15, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure is. The RNoN is taking part in the GWoT, and was highly active during the Cold War.Manxruler (talk) 03:34, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WWII exile in Halifax NS

[edit]

I see the passage about being based in Britain during the war, but on the waterfront in Halifax, Nova Scotia there's a memorial to the crew of teh RNN and the Norwegian Merchant Marine who were based out of Halifax during World War II. I'll take a picture of the monument and post it here, and also will ask in the Maritime Museum of the Atlantic, which it's next to, for further information.Skookum1 (talk) 15:57, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Royal Norwegian Navy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:38, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Royal Norwegian Navy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:28, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Royal Norwegian Navy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:47, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Royal_Norwegian_Navy&oldid=1261557193"