Talk:Royal New Zealand Electrical and Mechanical Engineers

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Royal New Zealand Electrical and Mechanical Engineers article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: South Pacific

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Untitled

I believe that this article is about a worthy organisation, however I am waiting on some information from a member of RNZEME - Southern Chapter so that I can provide more detail.

I have now added some more information including references, but am still awaiting more information from RNZEME members. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Synopsis76 (talk • contribs) 04:30, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please check for Typos (should Teeth Arms Corps be Tenth Armoured Corps, for example?) - together with LAD (which doesn't ring true as a military abbreviation) it makes the article sound a little like a belated April fools joke. However, I'm assuming good faith that it isn't. dramatic (talk) 00:01, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Synopsis76 (talk) 01:06, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As unlikely as it sounds Teeth Arms Corps is correct and the LAD acronym is mentioned on the [Light Aid Detachment] page.

I also find the name "Teeth Arms Corps" very odd, and I can find no Google hits for this term. Can you direct us to some mention of its existence? Would it be in Peter Cape's book, Craftsmen in Uniform?-gadfium 01:55, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Craftsmen in Uniform does not appear to mention the Teeth Arms Corps (it doesn't have an index, so I might have missed it on skimming the book), and the website linked to still has no content. I have removed mention of this body until such time as sources can be supplied.-gadfium 06:40, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Royal New Zealand Electrical and Mechanical Engineers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081021061932/http://www.nzdf.mil.nz/news/media-releases/20050923-doytvalr.htm to http://www.nzdf.mil.nz/news/media-releases/20050923-doytvalr.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:49, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]