Talk:Royal Free Hospital/Archive 1

myalgic encephalomyelitis

Wasn't there an outbreak at this hospital? If so, why isn't that mentioned here?

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nomorebigots (talk • contribs) 19:46, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a reliable source to support your belief then be bold and make an edit. Road Wizard (talk) 20:03, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done Already briefly mentioned at ME/CFS nomenclatures, I've added a short section on this with additional reference.David Ruben ^Talk 03:30, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

geographical co-ordinates wrong

Hi. I'm not sure how to fix this but clicking on the co-ordinates and going to Google Maps does not result in the correct location of the hospital. This is quite a serious problem for anyone trying to find their way there via Google Navigation.

External links

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Royal Free Hospital. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100914105055/http://www.shl.lon.ac.uk/specialcollections/archives/studentrecords.shtml to http://www.senatehouselibrary.ac.uk/our-collections/historic-collections/archives-manuscripts/university-of-london-student-records-1836-1931/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:29, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Royal Free Hospital. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100525134829/http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5683671.ece to http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5683671.ece

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:21, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MMR vaccine controversy

The Anome removed the section about the MMR controversy. Unfortunately the press conference was just a culmination of Wakefield using the RFH research infrastructure to conduct unethical research with a huge conflict of interest. The research governance processes failed abjectly, as demonstrated by Brian Deer in his Sunday Times investigations. The section, if anything, needs to be expanded. JFW | T@lk 20:49, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]