Rowntree trusts is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
I thought that the individual Rowntree trust were interesting enough to warrant their own pages, so I have removed the redirects on each one that pointed back to this 'Rowntree trusts' page. They are blank until I, or someone else, has some time to add something to each. - CharlesC23:49, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It is probably better to keep the redirect as long as no one has written anything on the individual pages; this is much more user-friendly, since reader actually get redirected to a page with some content rather than a short link. And this is what redirects are for... Schutz13:30, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]